Log in

Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All submitted articles are submitted to double blind peer review. Reviewers comment on a work’s strengths, weaknesses, make suggestions for improvement, and offer recommendations to the editors (accept, revise, reject). The review process takes between 4 and 6 weeks.

All submissions are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article fits the scope of the journal and is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.

The journal operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. The review period is expected to take around four to six weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, who is supported by an expert, international Editorial Board. 

Section Policies